Legal Opinion

Disbarment Proceedings v. Burke

Cuyahoga Circuit Court

Decided February 25, 1899PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

In this matter two charges have been made against Vernon H. Burke.

First, with having been guilty of misconduct in office as an attorney-at-law of the state of Ohio, and

Second, with having been guilty of unprofessional conduct involving moral turpitude.

Under these charges are three specifications:

The first is, that Vernon H. Burke and one Frank E. Dellenbaugh on January 1. 1895, and thence afterwards at all the dates and times mentioned and thence continuous^ thereafter to the present time were and still are, each of them, attorneys-at-law of the state of Ohio licensed as such and practicing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The People v. . ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. People v. ChoynskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. People v. TonielliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Moore v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
  5. Motsinger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. HassNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. CressOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. GefrohNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. HassNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API