Disbarment Proceedings v. Burke
Cuyahoga Circuit Court
1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.
In this matter two charges have been made against Vernon H. Burke.
First, with having been guilty of misconduct in office as an attorney-at-law of the state of Ohio, and
Second, with having been guilty of unprofessional conduct involving moral turpitude.
Under these charges are three specifications:
The first is, that Vernon H. Burke and one Frank E. Dellenbaugh on January 1. 1895, and thence afterwards at all the dates and times mentioned and thence continuous^ thereafter to the present time were and still are, each of them, attorneys-at-law of the state of Ohio licensed as such and practicing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The People v. . ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- People v. ChoynskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. TonielliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Moore v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
- Motsinger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. HassNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. CressOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. GefrohNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. HassNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.