People v. Etting
California Supreme Court
appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial., The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
Defendants were charged by information- with robbery, committed in the county of Los Angeles September 6, 1892, aud upon a trial were convicted.
The appeal is from the judgment of conviction and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
The information was signed as follows':—•
“James McLachlan, District Attorney in and for the County of Los Angeles, State of California. By D. W. Diel, Deputy.”
It is sufficient that the name of the district attorney is signed *578to an indictment or information by his deputy. (People v. Darr, 61 Cal. 554; People v. Turner, 85 Cal. 432.)
The following…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. VelardeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- People v. ManningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- People v. CloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- People v. RodundoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- People v. TonielliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Clark v. AllowayIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
- State v. CatesMontana Supreme Court · 1934
- State v. BuralliNevada Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.