People v. Buckley
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. William T. Wallace, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
In this case the Department having failed to agree upon a judgment, a .reargument was had in Bank. The defendant was a member of the board of election in the tenth precinct of the thirty-fifth assembly district, in the city and county of San Francisco, at the general election of 1894. The information charges that at such election the defendant and one L. M. Martinet altered the official returns, and returned and caused to be received as true and official returns certain false and fraudulent tally lists, etc.
As presented here the transcript contains no evidence tending to show guilt in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. FisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
- People v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- People v. TonielliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. EnglishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re BegerowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Owens v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. MoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. BencCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Herrick v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.