Legal Opinion
McIsaac v. Hale
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 13, 1926PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.
The issue in this case concerns the application of a term in the lease of a garage building, which provided that on the completion of certain alterations, “some of which have already been made,” the annual rental should be increased by an amount equal to ten per cent, of their cost. On the first trial, the court concluded that this provision of the lease was not intended to cover certain improvements made in 1918, some months before the execution of the lease, and in particular found that the monthly rental fixed in the lease in question exceeded the rental paid under a preceding oral lease…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Leahy v. CheneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Corbett v. MatzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- Healy v. Loomis InstituteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Friedler v. HekelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- McIsaac v. HaleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. CarboneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Wendland v. Ridgefield Construction Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Osterlund v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Smirnoff v. McNerneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Wells v. LavittSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.