Legal Opinion

Smirnoff v. McNerney

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 12, 1930PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.

This action grew out of a collision between two automobiles at a street intersection. The appellant claimed error in certain rulings upon evidence. One of them is the exclusion of the report of the accident made by the defendant Peter McNerney to the commissioner of motor vehicles. McNerney was the driver of the car which was owned by his wife, the other defendant, and was claimed by the plaintiff to be a family car. The report would ordinarily have been admissible against him as a party to the action and against his wife by reason of the agency to make it implied in his being the operator of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. BeatmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  2. Nehring v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  3. Ezzo v. GeremiahSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  4. Monroe v. Hartford Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
  5. Gertz v. Fitchburg RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. SaurisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Kinderavich v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  3. Jackson v. WallerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  4. Petrillo v. KolbaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. Duncan v. McTiernanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API