Legal Opinion
Osterlund v. State
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 3, 1949PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The plaintiff has appealed from the dismissal of an appeal taken by him from the denial by a workmen’s compensation commissioner of a motion in which the plaintiff sought to have the weekly rate of compensation previously awarded him increased, to secure a finding that he was totally incapacitated, and to obtain other relief.
In order to understand the issues before us, it is necessary to trace from their inception the proceedings brought by the plaintiff to secure compensation. The original award, made on March 30, 1940, and on file in the office of the clerk of the Superior Court in Hartford…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Matter of Jordan v. . Decorative Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Reiley v. HealeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Osterlund v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Frennier's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Connelly's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1923
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Rayhall v. Akim Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Florence Bowers v. Connecticut National BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Pepin v. City of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Marandino v. Prometheus PharmacySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Wendland v. Ridgefield Construction Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.