Corbett v. Matz
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Writ of error to reverse a judgment of the City Court of New Haven, Bow, J., rendered against the plaintiff and others, brought to the Supreme Court of Errors held at New Haven within and for the third judicial district on the third Tuesday of January, 1900. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
The defendants in error obtained a judgment of foreclosure in the City Court of New Haven on the 20th of April, 1899, in an action in which the plaintiff in error appeared as a defendant, filed an answer and was fully heard. The judgment file of that date, which is in due form, states that the court found all the allegations of the complaint true. There was no continuance of the case for any purpose, and no further action taken upon it during that term. Under the city charter a new term of the court began on the first Monday of the following July.
In the present writ of error brought to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Johnson v. HigginsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
- Sturdevant v. StantonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
- Taylor v. GilletteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1884
- Kashman v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Scholfield Gear & Pulley Co. v. ScholfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Berry v. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Barber v. International Co. of MexicoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
- Bulkeley's AppealSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- State v. AssuntinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.