Legal Opinion
Healy v. Loomis Institute
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 5, 1925PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
Before considering the conclusions reached by the court, we shall dispose of the ruling on evidence. Nothing appears in the finding but an excerpt from the stenographic record containing the objection to the offer, the claims made in support of the offer, and the ruling of the court. The relevant facts preceding the offer are not given. Counsel have discussed this offer as if these facts were stated in the claims made and as if they had been stated in accord anee with the rule. Practice Book, p. 272, § 133. We will dispose of this ruling upon the same assumption. Certain members of the Loomis…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Union Pacific R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
- MacKenzie v. Trustees of the PresbyterySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905
- Fuller v. Trustees of the Academic School in PlainfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1827
- First Congregational Society v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Printing House v. TrusteesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Averill v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Wiegand v. the Barnes FoundationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Conway v. EmenySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Blumenthal v. BarnesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Carl J. Herzog Foundation, Inc. v. University of BridgeportConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.