Legal Opinion
Kneip v. Unitedbank-Victoria
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided June 30, 1987No. 13-86-291-CVPublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*132OPINION
NYE, Chief Justice.
Appellants, Cecil and Sylvia Kneip and their son, Gary, sued Unitedbank-Vietoria for fraudulently inducing them to enter into a loan agreement with the bank. The bank counterclaimed for recovery on the promissory note issued by the Kneips in exchange for the loan from the bank, and for foreclosure on the deed of trust securing the loan. The Kneips received favorable jury findings on all special issues. However, the trial court disregarded the jury’s findings concerning the bank’s counterclaim and entered judgment that the Kneip’s recovery for fraud be offset by the…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
- Cavnar v. Quality Control Parking, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Dyson v. Olin Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Vickery v. VickeryTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Worsham Steel Co. v. Arias, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992
- C.P. Interests, Inc. v. California Pools, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Esparza v. Scott and White Health Plan, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
- Osbourne v. Capital City Mortgage Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.