Legal Opinion
Osbourne v. Capital City Mortgage Corp.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 13, 1995No. 93-CV-1653PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
This appeal is from an order granting summary judgment to appellee Capital City Mortgage Corporation in a suit by appedants Larry and Sandra Osbourne for breach of contract and other claims relating to a loan transaction between the parties. The Os-bournes contend that, contrary to the conclusions of the trial judge: (1) the record presents triable issues of fact on their claims of breach of contract and unfair and deceptive trade practices; (2) the deed of trust did not permit Capital City to advance superior trust payments to a previous note holder and charge…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Kilduff v. Adams, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Wallace v. Warehouse Employees Union No. 730District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Jones v. Howard University, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Busby v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Busby v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Campbell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
- Williams v. Purdue Pharma Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- DeBerry v. First Government Mortgage & Investors Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.