Legal Opinion

C.P. Interests, Inc. v. California Pools, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 30, 2001No. 99-21038PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:

Defendant-Appellant California Pools, Inc. appeals the judgment of the district court based on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff-appellee C.P. Interests, Inc., finding that C.P. Interests had remote junior user rights to the trademark “California Pools” in the Houston area, that California Pools had infringed those rights, and that California Pools had disparaged C.P. Interests. California Pools challenges the finding of business disparagement, the admission of expert testimony, the admission of oral testimony on the transfer of trademark rights, several jury…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Specht v. JensenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Foradori v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  2. Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. v. CammarataDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
  3. Brown v. Parker Drilling Offshore Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  4. Emergency One, Incorporated, D/B/A American Eagle Fire Apparatus Company, Incorporated v. American Fire Eagle Engine Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  5. Jeffrey Neely v. PSEG Texas Limited Partnership, eCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API