Legal Opinion
State v. Trong Kim Huynh
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 21, 1993No. C6-92-1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHORT, Judge.
This criminal appeal involves the interpretation and construction of Minnesota’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), Minn.Stat. §§ 609.901-.912 (1990). A jury convicted Trong Kim Huynh (Huynh) of five counts of coercion in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.27, subds. *4801(2), 2(2) (1990) and one count of racketeering in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 609.903, subd. 1, .904, subd. 1 (1990). The trial court sentenced Huynh to an executed term of 146 months. On appeal, he argues: (1) the state’s evidence against him was insufficient as a matter of law; (2) the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Clarence E. Bennett v. Kenneth Berg, Dan R. Sandford, Jr. v. Kenneth BergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- United States v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Trong Kim HuynhSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. LongoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- State v. Trong Kim HuynhSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.