Legal Opinion
State v. Trong Kim Huynh
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 30, 1994No. C6-92-1935Published
1Opinion of the Court
519 N.W.2d 191 (1994)
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,
v.
Trong Kim HUYNH, Petitioner, Appellant.
No. C6-92-1935.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
June 30, 1994.
Rehearing Denied August 11, 1994.
John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Lawrence Hammerling, Deputy State Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, and Michael O. Freeman, Hennepin County Atty., Paul R. Scoggin, Asst. County Atty., Minneapolis, for respondent.
Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.
OPINION
SIMONETT, Justice.
In this case we consider what constitutes an "enterprise" under…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Milan Bagaric, Mile Markich, Ante Ljubas, Vinko Logarusic, Ranko Primorac, and Drago SudarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- United States v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. KragnessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.