Legal Opinion

John P. Mills Organization, Inc. v. Unger

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 11756PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Defendant Guardian Investment Corporation of California appeals from a judgment rendered against it on a surety bond in which defendant Unger was named as principal, and plaintiff was named as beneficiary.

The facts out of which this controversy arose are as follows:

In June, 1926, plaintiff sold to Unger ten vacant hfis located in the city and county of Los Angeles. Plaintiff accepted a small down payment on the purchase price, and as evidence of the balance accepted ten promissory notes secured by ten deeds of trust. Nine of these notes were in the sum of $1959.30 each, while the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Westcott v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. Hunstock v. Royal Securities Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Sautter v. FrickNew York Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Westcott v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. McCauslan v. Zoar Holding Co.New York Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Souza v. Westlands Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Surety Savings & Loan Ass'n v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API