Legal Opinion
Sautter v. Frick
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.
The bond on which this action is brought and the mortgage accompanying it are dated October 7, 1912, and were delivered to the plaintiff by Charles F. Lane, now deceased, to secure the payment of the sum of «$2,000.
The plaintiff became the owner by assignment of a mortgage made by said Charles F. Lane, dated October 21, 1909.
In each of these mortgages the same real property was conveyed as security for the payment of the mortgage debt.
In 1914 the plaintiff foreclosed the prior of these mortgages and upon the foreclosure sale bid in the property. He now seeks to recover from the estate of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dickason v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Westcott v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Hull v. CronkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Stehl v. UrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
3Cited by2 opinions
- John P. Mills Organization, Inc. v. UngerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Ralph Klonick Corp. v. HaasNew York Supreme Court · 1930