Legal Opinion
Hunstock v. Royal Securities Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 18, 1921No. Civ. No. 3476PublishedCited by 3 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
This action was brought and recovery allowed upon a bond executed by one Ruben with the appellant corporation as surety, and in favor of the plaintiff. Judgment was in accordance with the prayer of the complaint and from that judgment this appeal is taken.
As to the main facts no dispute is shown in the record. It appears that in November, 1916, Ruben was desirous of purchasing from the plaintiff a lot in the city of Los Angeles upon which to erect an apartment house. The price of the property, as agreed upon ■ between plaintiff and Ruben, was the sum of fifteen thousand dollars. Ruben had not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sather Banking Co. v. Arthur R. Briggs Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Stevens v. PartridgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Oakland v. De GuardaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- John P. Mills Organization, Inc. v. UngerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Ramish v. AstorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935