Legal Opinion

Westcott v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 20, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Trial Term, New York County. Action by Robert E. Westcott against the Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtHatch, J.

The action was brought to recover the penalty of a bond given by the defendant in the sum of $15,000. Prior to November 10, 1898, the plaintiff was the owner of certain premises located on Riverside Drive, between Ninety-Fourth and Ninety-Fifth streets, in the city of New York. Talbot, a contractor and builder, purchased the premises for the sum of $55,000, and gave a purchase-money mortgage thereon for the full amount of the purchase price. At the same time Talbot entered into a contract with plaintiff for the erection of a building upon the premises, and, for the purpose of securing a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Kidd v. . McCormickNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Mathews v. . AikinNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
  4. Clift v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  5. Belleville Savings Bank v. ReisIllinois Supreme Court · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. John P. Mills Organization, Inc. v. UngerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Westcott v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API