Legal Opinion

Souza v. Westlands Water District

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 17, 2006No. F045293, F046478PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WISEMAN, J.

By statute, a California water district may add unpaid water charges to its regular assessment against land served by the district. The assessment automatically constitutes a lien on the land, and this is true whether the water was used by the owner or a tenant. This case presents an issue of first impression: Where the water is used by a tenant, does a district forfeit its right to add the charges to the assessment and encumber the land because, had the district followed its own regulations, the tenant would have been required to post adequate security for all the charges…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Garcia v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Orff v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Redevelopment Agency v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Martinez v. Socoma Companies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Ste. Marie v. Riverside County Regional Park & Open-Space DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. City of Brentwood v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Deerpoint Grp., Inc. v. Agrigenix, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
  5. Goddard v. Google, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API