Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Wilmore
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 1, 1999No. 99SA14PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez
In this personal injury lawsuit, the plaintiff retained and endorsed an expert witness who was previously retained and utilized as a pretrial consultant by the opposing party. Fearing that their former consultant will be in a position to utilize confidential information to their detriment at trial, Petitioners/Defendants Robert Wilmore and Tramp Master, Inc. (collectively “Wilmore”), have sought relief in the nature of mandamus pursuant to article VI, section 3 of the Colorado Constitution and C.A.R. 21. Wilmore asserts that the trial court erroneously refused to disqualify the expert from…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Margolis v. District Court in & for the County of ArapahoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- English Feedlot, Inc. v. Norden Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
- Paul v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
- Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Toshiba Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Leaffer v. ZarlengoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Formosa Plastics Corp., USA v. Kajima International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
- CLPF-Parkridge One, L.P. v. Harwell Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- People v. Argomaniz-RamirezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- State v. Nevada R. UgaldeMontana Supreme Court · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.