Legal Opinion
Williams v. Tulsa Motels
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 21, 1998No. 89857PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
¶ 1 The issue before this Court is whether the trial court’s grant of summary judgment was proper. We find that summary judgement was proper.
I. FACTS
¶ 2 The plaintiff, Glenn C. Williams, was a guest at the Holiday Inn Holidome in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The Holidome is owned by the defendants. While leaving the Holidome, Williams descended a staircase. At the bottom of the stairs, Williams had to make a turn to exit the Holidome. About three or four steps after the turn, a maid was mopping the floor with her service cart placed beside her and in front of an ice machine. *1284When Williams…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Taylor v. HynsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- McKinney v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- CR Anthony Company v. MillionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Fowler v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- WOOD v. MERCEDES-BENZ OF OKLAHOMA CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- STATE ex rel. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION v. LAMAR ADVERTISING OF OKLAHOMA, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Dover v. W.H. Braum, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Hatcher v. Super C MartCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
- Moore v. Albertson's, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.