Legal Opinion
McKinney v. Harrington
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 29, 1993No. 78490PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Judge:
Plaintiff was injured when he partially fell through Defendant’s roof while repairing it. This is Plaintiff’s suit for damages based on allegations of homeowner’s negligence. Both parties moved for summary judgment in the trial court, and the Defendant/homeowner’s motion was granted. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for trial. We have granted certio-rari, and now affirm the-judgment of the District Court.
The uncontroverted facts presented to the trial court included these: Plaintiff McKinney worked for a roofing company. The owner of the roofing company had contracted…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Woods v. Fruehauf Trailer Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Rogers v. HennesseeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Davis v. WhitsettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Jones v. Alpine Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Foster v. HardingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Scott v. Archon Group, L.P.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Martinez v. Angel Exploration, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Martin v. Aramark Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Cinco Enterprises, Inc. v. BensoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Warner v. Hillcrest Medical CenterCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.