Bilec v. Auburn & Associates, Inc. Pension Trust
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge:
In this case we are called upon to determine whether the trial court properly upheld the enforcement of a non-competition pension forfeiture clause which had been placed by the appellee-employer, Auburn & Associates, Inc., into a contract it entered into with the appellee-insurer, Provident Mutual Insurance Co., for the administration of its employee pension plan against the appellants who were all former employees. We find that, the appellee-employer has failed to meet any of the criteria set forth by our Courts for the *179enforcement of a non-competition covenant against the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. MartucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Piercing Pagoda, Inc. v. HoffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Sidco Paper Company v. AaronSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Maintenance Specialties, Inc. v. GottusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Kurtas v. KurtasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Fraser v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Fraser v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Insulation Corp. of America v. BrobstonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Fraser v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.