Legal Opinion
Kurtas v. Kurtas
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 3, 1989No. 11 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1988PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
ZAPPALA, Justice.
In this appeal, we are requested to review the order and memorandum opinion of the Superior Court, 368 Pa.Super. 648, 531 A.2d 39, affirming the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County which had denied the appellant’s post-trial motions. The basis of the Superior *107Court’s order was the untimeliness of the appellant’s post-trial motions. Because Superior Court abused its discretion, we reverse.
The facts germane to this appeal are as follows: The parties were married in 1950, separated in 1972 and divorced in 1985 in…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Fried v. FriedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- T. C. R. Realty, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Tagnani v. LewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Colagioia v. ColagioiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
3Cited by61 opinions
- Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Womer v. HillikerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Sahutsky v. H.H. Knoebel SonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. MetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- D.L. Forrey & Associates, Inc. v. Fuel City Truck Stop, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.