Henika v. Lange
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.
This action was commenced by the plaintiffs, who were lessees of the defendant, to recover damages in the sum of $4,800, alleged to have been sustained by them because of the failure of the defendant to perform the covenants of a lease upon her part to be performed. Thereafter an action was commenced by the defendant against the plaintiffs, in which she alleged that the plaintiffs had failed to comply with the terms of the lease on their part to be performed and had abandoned the property, by reason of which facts defendant had suffered damage in the sum of $6,250.
In the first action demurrer…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morffew v. S.F. & San Rafael R.R.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Keith v. Electrical Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
- Jersey Farm Co. v. Atlanta Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Kennedy v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Jersey Island Dredging Co. v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lemm v. Stillwater Land & Cattle Co.California Supreme Court · 1933
- Gruen Watch Co. v. Artists Alliance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Lindsay v. MacKCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Gilmore v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Isenberg v. SalyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.