Legal Opinion

Isenberg v. Salyer

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1944No. Civ. No. 3101PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

This is an action for unlawful detainer based upon a written lease between W. D. Isenberg, now de*940ceased, and Land Mortgage Corporation (W. D. Isenberg, president), as lessors, and defendant E. C. Salyer, as lessee. The lease covered 380 acres of farm land in the Tulare Lake basin. Defendant, in his answer, admitted the making of the lease but denied it was for a term of three years commencing on October 1, 1937, and alleged that on the contrary, the lease was for a term which would permit him to produce and harvest on the leased premises three annual crops of wheat or barley. He admitted his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eastman v. PiperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Asamen v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Weaver v. GrunbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Shelley v. ByersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Tide Water Associated Oil Co. v. CurtinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mehl v. People Ex Rel. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Stilwell v. TrutanichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Williams v. KrumsiekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Stilwell v. TrutanichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API