Legal Opinion

Bass Ex Rel. Bass v. Hocutt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 29, 1942PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBOENE, J.

Defendants upon trial below, in apt time, requested the court to charge the jury as follows: “1. If you find as facts from the evidence, and by its greater weight, that as the defendant, Mrs. Hocutt, approached the intersection of Enderly Road and Tuckaseegee Road, the plaintiff suddenly ran out into Tuckaseegee Road immediately behind an automobile passing in the opposite direction, and that this action on the part of the plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of his injury, you should answer the first issue, No.’ ”

We are of opinion that exception to the refusal to so charge is well taken.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. . MeltsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Calhoun v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Newman Ex Rel. Newman v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Michaux v. Paul Rubber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Snead v. HollomanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Millis Construction Co. v. Fairfield Sapphire Valley, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Sloan v. Miller Building Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. Faeber v. ECT CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Piazza v. KirkbrideSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API