Snead v. Holloman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WYNN, Judge.
I
Defendants first assign as error the trial judge’s granting of the plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict on the issue of contributory negligence. The defendants assert that the evidence at trial was sufficient to show that the plaintiff was negligent in the operation of his vehicle and that, therefore, the issue of contributory negligence should have been submitted to the jury. We disagree.
The purpose of a motion for directed verdict is to test the legal sufficiency of the evidence to take the case to the jury and to support a verdict for the nonmoving party. Wallace v.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Manganello v. Permastone, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Booker v. EverhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Wallace Ex Rel. Magers v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Pleasant Valley Promenade v. Lechmere, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Freese v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Lovell v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Bryant v. Thalhimer Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Farndale Co., LLC v. GibelliniCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.