Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Lansing Municipal Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 1, 1950No. Calendar 44,438PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

{dissenting). By this mandamus proceeding, in this Court plaintiff seeks to compel defendant Paul C. Younger, who is judge of the municipal court of the city of Lansing, to issue a warrant for the arrest of one Marshall Keeler. The complaint submitted to defendant charged Keeler with having violated PA 1948 (1st Ex Sess), No 43. Defendant refused to issue the warrant on the ground that the cited act is unconstitutional. If in the respect herein considered the act is unconstitutional mandamus should be denied; but if the act is not unconstitutional mandamus should be granted. We quote from Act…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Sitz v. Department of State PoliceMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. GonzalesMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  3. People v. ParisiMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  5. Tallman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API