Legal Opinion

University of Utah v. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Zur Foerderung Der Wissenschaften E.V.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 23, 2017No. 2016-1336PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNA, Circuit Judge.

Defendants-Appellants (“Max Planck”) appeal a decision of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, which found that this case was not “exceptional” within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 285 and thus denied Max Planck’s motion for attorney fees. The district court did not abuse its discretion. We therefore affirm.

Background

A. Discovery of the Patented Invention

The underlying dispute concerns inven-torship of the Tuschl II patents, 1 which relate to the field of RNA interference (“RNAi”). RNAi is a process for “silencing” certain genes from expressing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Sfa Systems, LLC v. Newegg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  4. Kimberly-Clark Corporation v. The Procter & Gamble Distributing Co., Inc. And the Procter & Gamble Company, Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  5. Michelle Ideker v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Raniere v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  2. Adjustacam, LLC v. Newegg, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  3. Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  4. Allen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
  5. Spineology, Inc. v. Wright Medical Technology Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API