Legal Opinion

Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 29, 2014No. 12-1163PublishedCited by 257 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sotomayor

*560 Section 285 of the Patent Act provides: "The court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party." 35 U.S.C. § 285 . In Brooks Furniture Mfg., Inc. v. Dutailier Int'l, Inc., 393 F.3d 1378 (2005), the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit interpreted § 285 as authorizing fee awards only in two circumstances. It held that "[a] case may be deemed exceptional" under § 285"when there has been some material inappropriate conduct," or when it is both "brought in subjective bad faith" and "objectively baseless." Id., at 1381 . We granted certiorari…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Brooks Furniture Manufacturing, Inc. v. Dutailier International, Inc. And Dutailier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Highmark, Inc. v. Allcare Health Management Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by257 opinions

  1. Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Wbip, LLC v. Kohler Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  4. Sunearth, Inc. v. Sun Earth Solar Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. Fears v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017

252 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API