Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sotomayor
*560 Section 285 of the Patent Act provides: "The court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party." 35 U.S.C. § 285 . In Brooks Furniture Mfg., Inc. v. Dutailier Int'l, Inc., 393 F.3d 1378 (2005), the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit interpreted § 285 as authorizing fee awards only in two circumstances. It held that "[a] case may be deemed exceptional" under § 285"when there has been some material inappropriate conduct," or when it is both "brought in subjective bad faith" and "objectively baseless." Id., at 1381 . We granted certiorari…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Brooks Furniture Manufacturing, Inc. v. Dutailier International, Inc. And Dutailier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Highmark, Inc. v. Allcare Health Management Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by257 opinions
- Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Wbip, LLC v. Kohler Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Sunearth, Inc. v. Sun Earth Solar Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Fears v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
252 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.