Legal Opinion

Raniere v. Microsoft Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 18, 2018No. 2017-1400, 2017-1401PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O'Malley, Circuit Judge.

*1300 Keith Raniere ("Raniere") appeals from the district court's decisions awarding attorney fees and costs to Microsoft Corporation and AT&T Corporation (together, "Appellees"). Raniere v. Microsoft Corp. , Nos. 15-0540 & 15-2298, 2016 WL 4626584 (N.D. Tex. Sept. 2, 2016) ( Fees Decision ); Raniere v. Microsoft Corp. , Nos. 15-0540 & 15-2298, slip op. (N.D. Tex. Dec. 22, 2016) (J.A. 34-40). Because the district court did not err in finding that Appellees are prevailing parties under 35 U.S.C. § 285 (2012), and did not abuse its discretion in awarding attorney fees and…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. San Diego County Credit Union v. CefcuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  2. B.E. Technology, L.L.C. v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
  3. Robinson v. O'RourkeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  4. Luv N' Care, Ltd. v. LaurainCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
  5. United Cannabis Corporation v. Pure Hemp Collective Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API