Legal Opinion

Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided August 9, 2017No. 2016-1115; 2016-1116; 2016-1842PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion concurring-in-part, dissenting-impart filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.

*1333DYK, Circuit Judge.

Romag Fasteners, Inc. (“Romag”) owns U.S. Patent No. 5,722,126 (“126 patent”) on magnetic snap fasteners, which it sells under its registered trademark, ROMAG, U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 2,095,367 (“’367 trademark”). Romag sued Fossil, Inc. and various retailers (together, “Fossil”) for, inter alia, patent infringement, trademark infringement, and violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (“CUT-PA”) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut (“district court”). The jury…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Smith v. City of JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Fair Wind Sailing Inc v. H. DempsterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  5. Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Sleepy's LLC v. Select Comfort Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  2. Edward Lewis Tobinick, MD v. M.D. Steven NOvellaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  3. Munchkin, Inc. v. Luv N' Care, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
  4. VeriSign, Inc. v. XYZ.COM LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  5. Alliance for Good Government v. Coalition for BettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API