Legal Opinion
Sofford v. Schindler Elevator Corp.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided February 28, 1997No. 1:95-cv-03099PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MILLER, District Judge.
Before me is defendant United Air Line’s (United) motion for summary judgment. Because I conclude that United has demonstrated that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law and that plaintiff has failed to show that there is a genuine issue for trial, United’s motion is granted, and this case is dismissed.
I
Jurisdiction.
Defendants removed this personal injury action on the basis of diversity of citizenship. Jurisdiction is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 and 1441.
II
Statement of Issues.
I…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Belinda MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NANNIE AND THE NEWBORNS, INC.; Business Solutions, Inc.; Larry D. Gudgel, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Vigil v. FranklinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Springer v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Lombard v. Colorado Outdoor Education Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- Henderson v. Master Klean Janitorial, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Thornbury v. AllenColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.