Legal Opinion

Birmingham Park Improvement Ass'n v. Rosso

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1959No. Docket 39, Calendar 46,147PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

This case involves the right of defendants Rosso to a claimed easement across certain property belonging to the defendant city of Birmingham. The material facts involved are not in dispute. In June, 1920, a corporation known as the H. and M. Land Company, being the owner of land located in Bloomfield township and the then village of Birmingham, caused to be recorded a plat thereof designated as Birmingham Park Allotment. The present controversy is concerned with lot 109 of said subdivision.

The plat did not impose restrictions on the lots but by subsequent written agreement dated July 27,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Briggs v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Monroe Carp Pond Co. v. River Raisin Paper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Oosterhouse v. BrummelMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Austin v. Van HornMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Kelley v. HoogerhydeMichigan Supreme Court · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Young v. MorrallMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Borman's, Inc. v. Great Scott Super Markets, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API