Legal Opinion

Austin v. Van Horn

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1929No. Docket No. 104, Calendar No. 34,022PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

The purpose of this suit was to restrain the defendants from erecting a store building on Livernois avenue in the city of Detroit in violation of building restrictions. The property is located in Robert Oakman’s Livernois and Oakman Highway subdivision which consists of 656 lots in the northeast corner of Livernois and Davison avenues. By deeds from the common grantor, all lots were restricted to residential purposes except three lots deeded to the Central Savings Bank and those fronting on La Belle avenue, which were intended for business use. The plaintiff owns lot 280 on Pasedena avenue,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sanborn v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Allen v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Longton v. StedmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Terrien v. ZwitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Lebo v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  3. Nerrerter v. LittleMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Webb v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Taylor Avenue Improvement Ass'n v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API