Legal Opinion

Monroe Carp Pond Co. v. River Raisin Paper Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1927No. Docket No. 34PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, C. J.

The defendants manufacture card board and box board at the city of Monroe. The wastes from the plants are discharged into the Raisin river. The plaintiff was organized in 1916, and since that time has operated a pond near the river below defendants’ mills for the- storage and feeding of carp, obtaining the water for the pond from the river, and also using the river to transport the fish from the pond to Monroe, from whence they are shipped alive in cars to eastern markets. Many of its fish have died.

This suit is brought to enjoin the pollution of the river water by defendants’ wastes, and to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Allouez Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Bolthouse v. De SpelderMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Parker v. American Woolen Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. Hall v. RoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Gehlen Bros. v. KnorrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hilt v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Thompson v. EnzMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  3. White Lake Improvement Ass'n v. City of WhitehallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Kernen v. Homestead Development Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation v. Nestlé Waters North America IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API