Legal Opinion

Granas v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided August 18, 2025No. 1:21-cv-00116Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION MARK GRANAS, Civ. No. 1:21-cv-00116-AA Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant. _______________________________________ AIKEN, District Judge: Plaintiff Mark Granas brought claims for disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”),

42 U.S.C. § 12101

et seq., and its state equivalent, ORS § 659A.112, against his former employer, Defendant Union Pacific Railroad. After a one-week trial, a unanimous jury found Union Pacific had violated the ADA and Oregon…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API