Legal Opinion
McMillin v. Walmart Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided November 5, 2024No. 2:24-cv-01533Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PENDLETON DIVISION JOSHUA G. MCMILLIN, an individual, Case No. 2:24-cv-01533-HL Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION v. WALMART INC., Defendant. _________________________________________ HALLMAN, United States Magistrate Judge: Pro se Plaintiff Joshua McMillin brings this action against Defendant Walmart, Inc. Plaintiff moved to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF 2. Because he has no appreciable income or assets, the Court granted that motion on September 23, 2024. ECF 5. However, this Court now recommends that Plaintiff’s Complaint…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.