Legal Opinion

Mark Granas v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided December 1, 2025No. 1:21-cv-00116Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION MARK GRANAS, Civ. No. 1:21-cv-00116-AA Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant. _______________________________________ AIKEN, District Judge: Plaintiff brought claims for disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”),

42 U.S.C. § 12101

et seq., and its state equivalent, ORS § 659A.112, against his former employer, Union Pacific Railroad. After a one-week trial, the jury found Union Pacific had violated the ADA and Oregon law. As a result, the jury’s…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API