Mark Granas v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION MARK GRANAS, Civ. No. 1:21-cv-00116-AA Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant. _______________________________________ AIKEN, District Judge: Plaintiff brought claims for disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”),
42 U.S.C. § 12101
et seq., and its state equivalent, ORS § 659A.112, against his former employer, Union Pacific Railroad. After a one-week trial, the jury found Union Pacific had violated the ADA and Oregon law. As a result, the jury’s…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.