Legal Opinion

Haag v. Hyundai Motor America

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided September 10, 2013No. 12-CV-6521LPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to New York State law on behalf of a putative class of ear buyers. Plaintiff alleges, inter aha, that defendant Hyundai Motor America breached the terms of an express service warranty. The matter was removed from New York Supreme Court, Monroe County to this Court on September 27, 2012 (Dkt. # 1), pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d) et seq. (“CAFA”). CAFA grants federal courts jurisdiction over proposed class actions where the amount in controversy exceeds five million dollars,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cynthia Maurizio v. Olivia Goldsmith, AKA Justine Rendal, AKA Randi J. GoldfieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  2. In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  3. Weaver v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  4. Statler v. Dell, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  5. Lexow & Jenkins v. Hertz Commercial Leasing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
  2. Marshall v. Hyundai Motor AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. Brady v. Basic Research, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  4. In re FCA US LLC Monostable Electronic Gearshift LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
  5. Bhatia v. 3M Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API