Legal Opinion

In re FCA US LLC Monostable Electronic Gearshift Litigation

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided November 15, 2017No. Case Number 16-md-02744; MDL No. 2744PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS ALLEGING FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

DAVID M. LAWSON, United States District Judge

This is the third motion to dismiss filed by the defendant under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) aimed at the first amended consolidated master class action complaint (FACMC) in this multidistrict litigation proceeding. The first two' motions challenged subject matter and personal jurisdiction under Rules 12(b)(1) and (2), respectively. The present motion is based on Rule 12(b)(6), but it adopts -the same reading of the FACMC that the…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. Alan Weiner, D.P.M. v. Klais and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. James Smith v. General Motors LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  2. Matanky v. Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  3. In re FCA US LLC Monostable Elec. Gearshift Litig.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
  4. Akno 1010 Market Street St. Louis Missouri LLC v. PourtaghiDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  5. Chapman v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API