Legal Opinion

Moss v. Warns

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1944PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFeitz, J.

The defendants’, Melvin Owen Warns’ and his wife Rose Anna Warns’, first contention on this appeal is that no enforceable listing contract engaging plaintiff’s services as a broker to sell their residence property was ever entered into by them. It is undisputed that at a conference between the parties at defendants’ residence the question of their selling the property and engaging plaintiff to procure a purchaser was discussed for several hours, and finally culminated in plaintiff’s preparing and signing in duplicate the listing agreement, dated November 14, 1942, which is involved in this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Russell v. RammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Morgan v. Whatley & WhatleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Braniff v. BaierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Sherwood v. RosensteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Crow v. CasadySupreme Court of Iowa · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lathrop v. GaugerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Boutelle v. ChrislawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Close v. RedeliusNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Libowitz v. Lake Nursing Home, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Kleven v. Cities Service Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API