Legal Opinion

Sherwood v. Rosenstein

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 20, 1929No. 27,396PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Defendant appealed from an order denying her alternative motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial.

Plaintiff, a realtor, seeks to recover $650 for services. Defendant owned and listed with plaintiff for sale an eight-family flat building. He negotiated an exchange agreement with one Ruedy which called for a conveyance of a dwelling house which was Ruedy’s homestead". This exchange agreement was signed by defendant and Ruedy. It was not signed by Ruedy’s wife. It contained a provision that defendant could view the Ruedy property, and if found other than as -represented or as understood…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Fenn v. Ware & OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. McDermott v. MahoneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. Weitzner v. ThingstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. Hamlin v. SchulteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Shell Oil Co. v. KaplerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Lathrop v. GaugerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Close v. RedeliusNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Marr v. BradleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. Moss v. WarnsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API