Sherwood v. Rosenstein
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Defendant appealed from an order denying her alternative motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial.
Plaintiff, a realtor, seeks to recover $650 for services. Defendant owned and listed with plaintiff for sale an eight-family flat building. He negotiated an exchange agreement with one Ruedy which called for a conveyance of a dwelling house which was Ruedy’s homestead". This exchange agreement was signed by defendant and Ruedy. It was not signed by Ruedy’s wife. It contained a provision that defendant could view the Ruedy property, and if found other than as -represented or as understood…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Fenn v. Ware & OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- McDermott v. MahoneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Weitzner v. ThingstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Hamlin v. SchulteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Shell Oil Co. v. KaplerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Lathrop v. GaugerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Close v. RedeliusNevada Supreme Court · 1950
- Marr v. BradleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Moss v. WarnsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.