Wood v. Etiwanda Water Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County and from an order denying a new trial. Benjamin P. Bledsoe, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
On November, 1893, plaintiffs commenced an action in the superior court of San Bernardino County against the Etiwanda Water Company and the California Improvement Company for the purpose of obtaining a perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from maintaining a pipe across the lands of the plaintiffs, and from diverting water from the East Canon, or Etiwanda Creek, through that pipe, the plaintiffs being the owners as tenants in common of a considerable tract of land, through which said creek flowed. Upon the trial of said action the court found that the stream of water known as East…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Richardson v. McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- De Necochea v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Utt v. FreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Willson v. CleavelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Judson v. MalloyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- People v. RiordanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Goodrich v. MortimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- People v. WyattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Bone v. TraftonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.