Legal Opinion

Valenzuela v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 9, 1996No. 2 CA-SA 96-0006PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Judge.

In this special action we are asked to decide whether a party is entitled to a peremptory change of judge under Ariz.R.Civ.P. 42(f)(1)(E), 16 A.R.S., after the dismissal of the party’s case by summary judgment has been reversed on appeal. We answer that question in the affirmative and necessarily conclude that the respondent trial judge abused his discretion in denying petitioners that right. Petitioners have no “equally plain, speedy, and adequate remedy by appeal,” Ariz.R.P.Spec. Action 1 and 4, 17B AR.S., and a special action is the proper method for obtaining review…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Castillo v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  3. State v. NeilArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Pottratz v. DavisDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1984
  5. King v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN & FOR COUNTY OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vega v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  2. State Board of Retirement v. WoodwardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  3. Brush Wellman, Inc. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. Coffee v. Ryan-TouhillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API