Legal Opinion

Brush Wellman, Inc. v. Lee

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 29, 2000No. 2 CA-SA 99-0124PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 This special action presents the following issue: After an appellate court reverses a trial court ruling and remands a case to the trial court for further proceedings, is a party entitled to a peremptory removal of a judge pursuant to Rule 42(f)(1), Ariz. R. Civ. P., 16 A.R.S., if that party had already exercised the right before the case was appealed? Based on the limitation in A.R.S. § 12-411(A) to one change of judge in any action, we conclude that, once a party has exereised the right to a peremptory change of judge, it is not renewed upon remand after…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. EmersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Adams v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State v. BlazakArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Taliaferro v. TaliaferroArizona Supreme Court · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bergeron Ex Rel. Perez v. O'NEILCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  2. State Ex Rel. Thomas v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  3. Marianne N. v. Department of Child SafetyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  4. David Garcia v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  5. Kimicata v. McGeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API