Legal Opinion

State Board of Retirement v. Woodward

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 15, 2006PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpina, J.

The primary question before us is whether the vote of the State Board of Retirement (board) to implement the pension forfeiture provisions of G. L. c. 32, § 15 (4), against former *699State Representative Francis Woodward, based on Woodward’s Federal convictions of mail fraud, wire fraud, interstate travel to commit bribery, and conspiracy to commit those crimes, was time barred. We hold that it was not, and that pension forfeiture proceedings under § 15 (4) are not subject to any statute of limitations.

1. Background. Woodward was a State representative from January, 1977, until May, 1992, and an…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Berman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. CareySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. DascalakisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Attorney General v. PelletierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  5. Boston Edison Co. v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  2. Indeck v. Clients' Security BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  3. Alves's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  4. Public Employee Retirement Administration Commission v. BettencourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  5. Retirement Board v. BuonomoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API