Legal Opinion

Farmers Union Warehouse v. Boyd

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 12, 1923No. 14591PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeix, J.

1. “The extraordinary motions or cases contemplated by the statute are such as do not ordinarily occur in the transaction of human affairs, as, when a man has been convicted of murder, and it afterwards appears that the supposed 'deceased is still alive, or where one is convicted on the testimony of a witness who is subsequently found guilty of perjury in giving that testimony, or whore there has been some providential cause, and eases of like character.” Harris v. Roan, 119 Ga. 379 (2) (46 S. E. 433); Norman v. Goode, 121 Ga. 449 (1) (49 S. E. 268).

2. Where a motion for a new trial, made at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harris v. RoanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Norman v. GoodeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Malone v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
  4. Merritt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  5. Evans v. GrierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moss v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  2. Gilpin v. Swainsboro Ice Fuel Co. Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  3. Howington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  4. Bivins v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. Jones v. Norris N. Smith Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API