Legal Opinion
Lane v. Urgitus
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided October 23, 2006No. 06SA49PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs
This case involves a dispute over real estate transaction referral fees among Colorado licensed real estate brokers who were members of the Denver Metropolitan Commercial Association of- REALTORS® ("DMCAR") when the transactions and disputes in this case arose.1 An express condition of membership is that members will submit such disputes to binding arbitration. Each of the brokers separately executed an application form for membership that included consent to arbitration in accordance with the requirements of interconnected local and national REALTOR® professional organizations.
The complaint…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Goodson v. American Standard Insurance Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- BRW, Inc. v. Dufficy & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Archangel Diamond Corp. v. LukoilSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- In Re Gulf Exploration, LLCTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Ingold v. AIMCO/Bluffs, L.L.C. ApartmentsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Moffett v. Life Care Centers of AmericaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
- MDC Holdings, Inc. v. Town of ParkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- Cherokee Metropolitan District v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.