Legal Opinion

Allen v. Pacheco

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 9, 2003No. 01SC744PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Mullarkey

I. Introduction

In this wrongful death ease, we address the question of whether the respondent Karen Pacheco is bound by an arbitration provision contained in her deceased husband’s agreement with his health maintenance organization (“HMO”). The court of appeals held that Pacheco was not bound by the arbitration agreement because the agreement does not apply to wrongful death actions filed by a *377member’s non-party spouse. Pacheco v. Allen, 55 P.3d 141, 143-44 (Colo.App.2001). We affirm the court of appeals on different grounds, holding that although the arbitration provision in the HMO contract…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Group Life & Health Insurance v. Royal Drug Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Union Labor Life Insurance v. PirenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States Department of Treasury v. FabeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. In Re Labatt Food Service, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Ping v. Beverly Enterprises, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Thompson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  4. Copper Mountain, Inc. v. Industrial Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  5. East Ridge of Fort Collins, LLC v. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API